the citation graph
NARBUTAS v. LITHUANIA
2023-12-19 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe
22What it rests on
3Relied on since
0Departed from
Relied on since
The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.
20253 judgments
3 judgments have relied on it, across 2025
first 2025 · last 2025 · busiest 2025 (3 judgments)
What it rests on
2023-06-20MARGARI v. GREECEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-03-09L.B. v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-03-02DZERKORASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-02-02AKSHIN GARAYEV v. AZERBAIJANEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-11-03MAMALADZE v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-11-03VEGOTEX INTERNATIONAL S.A. v. BELGIUMEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-07-05DROUSIOTIS v. CYPRUSEuropean Court of Human Rights2022-04-26MEDIENGRUPPE ÖSTERREICH GMBH v. AUSTRIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2018-12-04ILNSEHER v. GERMANYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2018-03-20RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2017-06-27MEDŽLIS ISLAMSKE ZAJEDNICE BRČKO AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2015-12-04ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2015-11-05NAGMETOV v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2015-06-16DELFI AS v. ESTONIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2015-02-10BÉLÁNÉ NAGY v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2014-03-25VISTIŅŠ AND PEREPJOLKINS v. LATVIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2014-01-28O'KEEFFE v. IRELANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2013-07-11MORICE v. FRANCEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2012-02-07AXEL SPRINGER AG v. GERMANYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2009-09-17ENEA v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2008-07-24VLADIMIR ROMANOV v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed1999-10-28WILLE v. LIECHTENSTEINEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed
20 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.
Apostolovi v. Bulgaria, no. 32644/09Becciev v. Moldova, no. 9190/03Brisc v. Romania, no. 26238/10Egeland and Hanseid v. Norway, no. 34438/04Godlevskiy v. Russia, no. 14888/03Imeri v. Croatia, no. 77668/14JGK Statyba Ltd and Guselnikovas v. Lithuania, no. 3330/12Jishkariani v. Georgia, no. 18925/09Lisovskij v. Lithuania, no. 36249/14Markus v. Latvia, no. 17483/10Milosavljev v. Serbia, no. 15112/07M.L. and W.W. v. Germany, nos. 60798/10Neagoe v. Romania, no. 23319/08Oran v. Turkey, nos. 1759/08Paulikas v. Lithuania, no. 57435/09Rinau v. Lithuania, no. 10926/09Sekmadienis Ltd. v. Lithuania, no. 69317/14Shorazova v. Malta, no. 51853/19Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133/99Springer SE and RTL Television GmbH v. Germany, no. 51405/12