Contract
JUDAI
the citation graph

VEGOTEX INTERNATIONAL S.A. v. BELGIUM

2022-11-03 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe

read the judgment

15What it rests on
33Relied on since
0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

33 judgments have relied on it, across 2023–2026

first 2023 · last 2026 · busiest 2025 (16 judgments)

2026-06-25SHEVCHUK v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2026-06-23TALESKI AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2026-05-26IDRIS AKHUNDOV v. AZERBAIJANEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2026-03-24MAMMADOVA AND MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJANEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2026-02-19SIMONCINI v. SAN MARINOEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-12-18LATORRE ATANCE v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rights2025-11-25SELIMI v. ALBANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-11-13ABO v. TÜRKİYEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-06-24BAGIROVA AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJANEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-06-24PĂCURAR v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-05-15VACHIK KARAPETYAN AND OTHERS v. ARMENIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-05-06BAYRAMOV v. AZERBAIJANEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-04-24SYTNYK v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-04-08GREEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOMEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-03-11AYTAJ AHMADOVA v. AZERBAIJANEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-02-18ALASGAROV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJANEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-02-04SKUČAI v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-01-21ÇAĞIL v. TÜRKİYEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-01-21JÓHANNES BALDURSSON AND BIRKIR KRISTINSSON v. ICELAND European Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-01-09ZAFFERANI AND OTHERS v. SAN MARINOEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-01-07UAB PROFARMA AND UAB BONA DIAGNOSIS v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-12-19EPISCOPO AND BASSANI v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-11-26NDI SOPOT S. A v. NORTH MACEDONIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-09-24FABBRI AND OTHERS v. SAN MARINOEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-02-13JAKUTAVIČIUS v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-02-13MAROSLAVAC v. CROATIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-01-18ISMAYILZADE v. AZERBAIJANEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-12-19NARBUTAS v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-10-19LOCASCIA AND OTHERS v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-07-06TULEYA v. POLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-07-04THANZA v. ALBANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-06-22LORENZO BRAGADO AND OTHERS v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-06-01GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLICEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed

What it rests on

26 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Antia and Khupenia v. Georgia, no. 7523/10 ×2A and B v. Norway [GC], nos. 24130/11Arnolin and Others v. France, nos. 20127/03Blanche de Castille and Others v. France, nos. 42219/98Cabourdin v. France, no. 60796/00Chap Ltd v. Armenia, no. 15485/09Chim and Przywieczerski v. Poland, nos. 36661/07Cimolino v. Italy, no. 12532/05Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France, nos. 65399/01Dimopulos v. Turkey, no. 37766/05Ferrazzini v. Italy [GC], no. 44759/98Hussein and Others v. Belgium, no. 45187/12Janosevic v. Sweden, no. 34619/97Legrand v. France, no. 23228/08Les Authentiks and Supras Auteuil 91 v. France, nos. 4696/11Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional v. Portugal, no. 4687/11Maggio and Others v. Italy, nos. 46286/09Ndayegamiye- Mporamazina v. Switzerland, no. 16874/12Others v. France, nos. 18096/12Petko Petkov v. Bulgaria, no. 2834/06Prikyan and Angelova v. Bulgaria, no. 44624/98Rivera Vazquez and Calleja Delsordo v. Switzerland, no. 65048/13S.C. Service Benz Com S.R.L. v. Romania, no. 58045/11Segame SA v. France, no. 4837/06