the citation graph
UAB PROFARMA AND UAB BONA DIAGNOSIS v. LITHUANIA
2025-01-07 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe
8What it rests on
0Relied on since
0Departed from
Relied on since
No judgment held here cites it.
What it rests on
2022-11-03VEGOTEX INTERNATIONAL S.A. v. BELGIUMEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2015-02-10BÉLÁNÉ NAGY v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2014-03-25VISTIŅŠ AND PEREPJOLKINS v. LATVIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2012-06-07CENTRO EUROPA 7 S.R.L. AND DI STEFANO v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2011-07-07STUMMER v. AUSTRIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2007-01-11ANHEUSER-BUSCH INC. v. PORTUGALEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2004-01-22JAHN AND OTHERS v. GERMANYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed1999-01-21GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed
7 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.
Moskal v. Poland, no. 10373/05 ×2Agro Frigo OOD v. Bulgaria, no. 39814/12Jantner v. Slovakia, no. 39050/97Kurban v. Turkey, no. 75414/10Lelas v. Croatia, no. 55555/08Trgo v. Croatia, no. 35298/04