Contract

the citation graph

VISTIŅŠ AND PEREPJOLKINS v. LATVIA

2014-03-25 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe

read the judgment

2What it rests on

29Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

+3 earlier20211 judgments20225 judgments20234 judgments20246 judgments20255 judgments20263 judgments

29 judgments have relied on it, across 2014–2026

first 2014 · last 2026 · busiest 2024 (6 judgments)

2026-06-23TALESKI AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2026-06-02OÜ PAREM KALLAS v. ESTONIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2026-03-03SAARIVUOMA SAMI VILLAGE v. NORWAYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2025-10-16BASYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rights 2025-09-25ISAIA AND OTHERS v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2025-07-09UKRAINE AND THE NETHERLANDS v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rights 2025-05-06JEWISH COMMUNITY OF THESSALONIKI v. GREECEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2025-01-07UAB PROFARMA AND UAB BONA DIAGNOSIS v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2024-12-10RAMAJ v. ALBANIAEuropean Court of Human Rights 2024-11-07RYBÁŘSTVÍ TŘEBOŇ A.S. AND RYBÁŘSTVÍ TŘEBOŇ HLD. A.S. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC European Court of Human Rights×2followed 2024-08-29PASQUINELLI AND OTHERS v. SAN MARINOEuropean Court of Human Rights 2024-06-11ZELA v. ALBANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2024-05-02THE J. PAUL GETTY TRUST AND OTHERS v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2024-02-15SHYLINA v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rights 2023-12-19NARBUTAS v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2023-11-27COMMUNAUTÉ GENEVOISE D'ACTION SYNDICALE (CGAS) v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rights 2023-01-23MACATĖ v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2023-01-19KOROTYUK v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2022-11-10ALASGAROV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJANEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2022-06-09MARIA AZZOPARDI v. MALTAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2022-06-09SAVICKIS AND OTHERS v. LATVIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2022-04-05NIT S.R.L. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2022-03-24PÁLKA AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLICEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2021-07-13TODOROV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2016-12-13BÉLÁNÉ NAGY v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2016-06-23BAKA v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed 2015-10-22KHALIKOVA v. AZERBAIJANEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2014-07-03R & L, S.R.O. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLICEuropean Court of Human Rights 2014-03-25VISTIŅŠ AND PEREPJOLKINS v. LATVIAEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed

What it rests on

2014-03-25VISTIŅŠ AND PEREPJOLKINS v. LATVIAEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed 2009-02-18ANDREJEVA v. LATVIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.