Contract
JUDAI
the citation graph

O'KEEFFE v. IRELAND

2014-01-28 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe

read the judgment

10What it rests on
36Relied on since
0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

36 judgments have relied on it, across 2015–2026

first 2015 · last 2026 · busiest 2023 (7 judgments)

2026-05-12BUDINOVA AND ISAEV v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2026-02-17KOFFI v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2026-01-22J.S. v. SLOVAKIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-12-11TSAAVA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rights2025-11-18ISKRA DOO BEOGRAD v. SERBIAEuropean Court of Human Rights2025-07-09UKRAINE AND THE NETHERLANDS v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-05-22GEVORGYAN v. ARMENIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-03-13VYACHESLAVOVA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-02-27I.C. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-11-19VIERU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-06-18A.P. v. ARMENIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-05-07BIBA v. ALBANIAEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2024-04-09VEREIN KLIMASENIORINNEN SCHWEIZ AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2024-02-20M.G. v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-12-19NARBUTAS v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-07-18CAMARA v. BELGIUMEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-06-27ISPIRYAN v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-03-09L.B. v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-02-14BYČENKO v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-01-26VALVERDE DIGON v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-01-19DOMENECH ARADILLA AND RODRÍGUEZ GONZÁLEZ v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-11-08AYUSO TORRES v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-10-18MUHAMMAD v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rights2022-05-17OGANEZOVA v. ARMENIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-03-17FU QUAN, S.R.O. v. THE CZECH REPUBLICEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-03-15GRZĘDA v. POLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2021-12-10ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2021-02-02X AND OTHERS v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2020-05-28Z v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2019-06-20A AND B v. CROATIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2018-11-06BURLYA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2017-12-19LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGALEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2017-06-13KOSTECKAS v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2017-03-30NAGMETOV v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rights2016-05-17KARÁCSONY AND OTHERS v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2015-10-20VASILIAUSKAS v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed

What it rests on

14 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

C.A.S. and C.S. v. Romania, no. 26692/05D.F. v. Latvia, no. 11160/07D v. Ireland, no. 26499/02ECHR 2000-XI and Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96Grzelak v. Poland, no. 7710/02Juppala v. Finland, no. 18620/03Leja v. Latvia, no. 71072/01O’Reilly v. Ireland, no. 24196/94Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201/06SEPARATE OPINIONS 75 Mikheyev v. Russia, no. 77617/01Shkalla v. Albania, no. 26866/05Storck v. Germany, no. 61603/00Valiuliene v. Lithuania, no. 33234/07X and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 19010/07