Contract

the citation graph

Carlos Rene RUBIO, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, Appellee

1980-09-24 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · United States

read the judgment

25What it rests on

8Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

19821 judgments19833 judgments19851 judgments19861 judgments19871 judgments4 years silent19911 judgments

8 judgments have relied on it, across 1982–1991

first 1982 · last 1991 · busiest 1983 (3 judgments)

1991-06-19Patrick Logan MONTGOMERY, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1987-05-20Herman Ray CANTRELL, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1986-04-23Bobby TEMPLIN, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1985-04-24Lester BOUTWELL, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1983-12-21Clyde WILLIAMS, Jr. & David Lee Smith, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×3 1983-04-06Lonnie Quincy PRIOR, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1983-03-30Robert Louis ELKINS, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1982-12-15Leroy BATES, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2

What it rests on

1979-12-19Oscar CARRILLO, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1979-10-10James Alvin MURPHY, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1979-02-21Joe RUIZ, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1979-01-03Larry Lee CHRISTIANSEN, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1978-12-13Ray Leroy MULCHAHEY, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×3 1978-11-15Charles Michael FINLEY, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1978-11-01Virgil John ETCHIESON, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1978-09-27Henry HINES, Jr., Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1978-06-21Jessie Ray JONES, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1977-03-16Larry Eugene WALLS, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1975-12-19John T. CAMERON, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×3 1975-10-15Mary Helen HALLIBURTON, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×3 1974-07-24David Jackson CRAWLEY, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1974-01-16Robert Earl RANSOM, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1973-06-20Jimmie Lewis LEE, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1973-04-25Domingo AVILLA, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1972-09-25Ervin Herman ALBRECHT, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×3 1972-06-21Charles Edward GRAYSON, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1972-06-07Guy FORD, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1972-03-22Robert CALDWELL, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1967-06-28J. J. JOHNSTON, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1961-11-22Fred v. Rangel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1953-11-11Richard Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×3 1951-04-04S. C. Couch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1950-03-08Dallas Railway & Terminal Company v. Mrs. Letta M. FarnsworthTexas Supreme Court×2

57 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.