J. J. JOHNSTON, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, Appellee

1967-06-28 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · United States

0What it rests on

7Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

19741 judgments6 years silent19802 judgments4 years silent19841 judgments19852 judgments17 years silent20021 judgments

7 judgments have relied on it, across 1974–2002

first 1974 · last 2002 · busiest 1980 (2 judgments)

2002-01-30Dennis D. WHEELER, Appellant, v. the STATE of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1985-07-10Danny Marshall MORGAN, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1985-04-24Lester BOUTWELL, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1984-01-19Isidro Miguel VELOZ, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeTexas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1980-09-24Carlos Rene RUBIO, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1980-02-06Sam R. SANDERS, Jr., Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1974-07-10Bufford Lenell MCDONALD, Alias Joe McDonald, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

What it rests on

10 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.