Contract

the citation graph

Ervin Herman ALBRECHT, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, Appellee

1972-09-25 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · United States

read the judgment

10What it rests on

34Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

+11 earlier19855 judgments19861 judgments19873 judgments19882 judgments19911 judgments11 years silent20021 judgments

34 judgments have relied on it, across 1972–2002

first 1972 · last 2002 · busiest 1985 (5 judgments)

2002-01-30Dennis D. WHEELER, Appellant, v. the STATE of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1991-06-19Patrick Logan MONTGOMERY, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1988-09-14Denton Alan CRANK, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1988-01-14John Arthur RODDA, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Appeals of Texas 1987-10-07LaStarza MANNIE, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeTexas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)×2 1987-08-17Timothy Brian COLE, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeTexas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1987-05-20Herman Ray CANTRELL, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1986-04-23Bobby TEMPLIN, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1985-10-23Donald J. ROBINSON, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1985-10-09Bobby James MOORE, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1985-07-10Danny Marshall MORGAN, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1985-06-19Jeffrey D. PLANTE, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1985-04-24Lester BOUTWELL, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1984-01-19Isidro Miguel VELOZ, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeTexas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983-12-21Clyde WILLIAMS, Jr. & David Lee Smith, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1983-04-06Lonnie Quincy PRIOR, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1982-03-10John SEWELL, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1980-09-24Carlos Rene RUBIO, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×3 1980-02-06Sam R. SANDERS, Jr., Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1979-12-19Oscar CARRILLO, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×3 1979-01-03Larry Lee CHRISTIANSEN, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1978-11-15Charles Michael FINLEY, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1978-06-21Jessie Ray JONES, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1977-03-16Larry Eugene WALLS, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1975-12-19John T. CAMERON, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×3 1975-10-15Mary Helen HALLIBURTON, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×4 1975-03-12Charles Anthony REDD, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×3 1974-07-24David Jackson CRAWLEY, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1974-07-10Bufford Lenell MCDONALD, Alias Joe McDonald, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1974-01-16Robert Earl RANSOM, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1974-01-16Ronald Wayne MITCHELL and Willie Earl Ratliff, Appellants, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1973-12-19Lanis Ray COBB, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1972-12-06Howard FRANKLIN, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1972-09-25Ira ROGERS, Jr., Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

What it rests on

1972-09-25Tommy RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1972-06-28Francisco Hernandez HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1972-06-21Charles Edward GRAYSON, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1972-06-07Guy FORD, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1972-05-24Lucille ROBLEDO, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1972-04-19T. C. JONES, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1972-03-22Robert CALDWELL, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1971-11-16Harry Andrew LANHAM, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1969-12-10Francis OWENS, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1953-11-11Richard Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

40 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.