Contract
JUDAI
the citation graph

PERKINS, SECRETARY OF LABOR, Et Al. v. LUKENS STEEL CO. Et Al.

1940-04-29 · Supreme Court of the United States · United States

read the judgment

14What it rests on
4Relied on since
0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

4 judgments have relied on it, across 1943–1968

first 1943 · last 1968 · busiest 1943 (1 judgments)

What it rests on

1940-01-29Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States1939-01-30TENNESSEE ELECTRIC POWER CO. Et Al. v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1938-12-05SHIELDS Et Al. v. UTAH IDAHO CENTRAL RAILROAD CO.Supreme Court of the United States1938-01-03ALABAMA POWER CO. v. ICKES, FEDERAL EMERGENCY ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1937-03-01AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. HAWORTH Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1933-11-20Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Ry. Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States1928-05-14GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1925-06-01Pierce, Governor of Oregon, Et Al. v. Society of Sisters; Pierce, Governor of Oregon, Et Al. v. Hill Military AcademySupreme Court of the United States1925-03-02Work, Secretary of the Interior v. United States Ex Rel. RivesSupreme Court of the United States1923-06-11Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury, Et Al.; Frothingham v. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1922-02-27Fairchild v. Hughes, as Secretary of State of the United States, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1919-06-02United States v. Babcock; United States v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States1915-11-01Truax and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States1902-11-17American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnultySupreme Court of the United States

18 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.