Contract
JUDAI
the citation graph

Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury, Et Al.; Frothingham v. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury, Et Al.

1923-06-11 · Supreme Court of the United States · United States

read the judgment

1What it rests on
15Relied on since
0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

15 judgments have relied on it, across 1936–1968

first 1936 · last 1968 · busiest 1936 (2 judgments)

1968-06-10FLAST Et Al. v. COHEN, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1967-05-22ABBOTT LABORATORIES Et Al. v. GARDNER, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1961-10-09POE Et Al. v. ULLMAN, STATE'S ATTORNEYSupreme Court of the United States1953-06-15BARROWS Et Al. v. JACKSONSupreme Court of the United States1944-02-28STARK ET AL. v. WICKARD, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1943-02-08ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES OF NEW YORK STATE, Inc., v. ICKES, Secretary of the Interior, Et Al.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit1942-04-06Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States1940-12-16L. SINGER & SONS Et Al. v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.Supreme Court of the United States1940-04-29PERKINS, SECRETARY OF LABOR, Et Al. v. LUKENS STEEL CO. Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1939-06-05COLEMAN Et Al. v. MILLER, SECRETARY OF THE SENATE OF THE STATE OF KANSAS, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1939-01-30TENNESSEE ELECTRIC POWER CO. Et Al. v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1938-01-03ALABAMA POWER CO. v. ICKES, FEDERAL EMERGENCY ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1937-03-01AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. HAWORTH Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1936-02-22GREENWOOD COUNTY, S. C., Et Al. v. DUKE POWER CO. Et Al.Fourth Circuit1936-02-17ASHWANDER Et Al. v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States

What it rests on

18 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.