American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnulty

1902-11-17 · Supreme Court of the United States · United States

read the judgment

0What it rests on

5Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

19391 judgments19401 judgments19431 judgments19441 judgments26 years silent19701 judgments

5 judgments have relied on it, across 1939–1970

first 1939 · last 1970 · busiest 1939 (1 judgments)

1970-03-09BARLOW Et Al. v. COLLINS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL STABILIZATION AND CONSERVATION SERVICE, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States 1944-02-28STARK ET AL. v. WICKARD, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States 1943-02-08ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES OF NEW YORK STATE, Inc., v. ICKES, Secretary of the Interior, Et Al.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 1940-04-29PERKINS, SECRETARY OF LABOR, Et Al. v. LUKENS STEEL CO. Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States 1939-01-30TENNESSEE ELECTRIC POWER CO. Et Al. v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States

What it rests on

4 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.