the citation graph
P.W. v. AUSTRIA
2022-06-21 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe
11What it rests on
2Relied on since
0Departed from
Relied on since
The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.
20251 judgments20261 judgments
2 judgments have relied on it, across 2025–2026
first 2025 · last 2026 · busiest 2025 (1 judgments)
What it rests on
2019-10-08DENIS AND IRVINE v. BELGIUMEuropean Court of Human Rights2019-01-31ROOMAN v. BELGIUMEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2018-12-19MOLLA SALI v. GREECEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2018-12-04ILNSEHER v. GERMANYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2017-02-23DE TOMMASO v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2016-05-24BIAO v. DENMARKEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2015-09-01KHLAIFIA AND OTHERS v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2013-07-25KHODORKOVSKIY AND LEBEDEV v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rights2012-01-17STANEV v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2009-03-10BYKOV v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2000-10-05VARBANOV v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed
6 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.
Fabris v. France [GC], no. 16574/08Kadusic v. Switzerland, no. 43977/13Kuttner v. Austria, no. 7997/08Lorenz v. Austria, no. 11537/11N. v. Romania, no. 59152/08Ruiz Rivera v. Switzerland, no. 8300/06