Contract
JUDAI
the citation graph

ROOMAN v. BELGIUM

2019-01-31 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe

read the judgment

5What it rests on
27Relied on since
0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

27 judgments have relied on it, across 2021–2026

first 2021 · last 2026 · busiest 2025 (7 judgments)

2026-05-19K.A. v. AUSTRIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2026-03-31MAKKI v. DENMARKEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2026-02-05MORAWIEC v. POLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2026-02-03O.H. AND OTHERS v. SERBIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-11-06B.M. v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-11-06M.A. v. LATVIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-07-31SIEDLECKA v. POLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-06-25KOVAČEVIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-05-20MATCHAVARIANI v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-04-10MORABITO v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-02-06M.B. v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rights2024-10-15HAUGEN v. NORWAYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-10-10ELDAR HASANOV v. AZERBAIJANEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-06-25KURKUT AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-02-08BOGDAN v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rights2023-10-17A.D. v. MALTAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-07-06TULEYA v. POLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-03-07MAMASAKHLISI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA AND RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rights2023-03-02DZERKORASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-01-24KUTAYEV v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-11-22G.M. AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-09-15KAGANOVSKYY v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-09-15VADYM MELNYK v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-06-21P.W. v. AUSTRIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-04-07MIKLIĆ v. CROATIAEuropean Court of Human Rights2021-11-18M.H. AND OTHERS v. CROATIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2021-06-01DENIS AND IRVINE v. BELGIUMEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed

What it rests on

55 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Lankester v. Belgium, no. 22283/10 ×3B. v. Germany, no. 61272/09 ×2Caryn v. Belgium, no. 43687/09 ×2Dufoort v. Belgium, no. 43653/09 ×2Gelaude v. Belgium, no. 43733/09 ×2Glien v. Germany, no. 7345/12 ×2Moreels v. Belgium, no. 43717/09 ×2Oukili v. Belgium, no. 43663/09 ×2Plaisier v. Belgium, no. 28785/11 ×2Saadouni v. Belgium, no. 50658/09 ×2S. v. Germany, no. 3300/10 ×2Swennen v. Belgium, no. 53448/10 ×2W.D. v. Belgium, no. 73548/13 ×2Bergmann v. Germany, no. 23279/14Çetin v. Turkey, no. 44084/10Claes v. Belgium, no. 43418/09Cocaign v. France, no. 32010/07Compare De Donder and De Clippel v. Belgium, no. 8595/06De Schepper v. Belgium, no. 27428/07Dhoest v. Belgium, no. 10448/83Enache v. Romania, no. 10662/06H.W. v. Germany, no. 17167/11January 2014 - Van Meroye v. Belgium, no. 330/09JUDGMENT Kadusic v. Switzerland, no. 43977/13