KHASANOV AND RAKHMANOV v. RUSSIA

2022-04-29 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe

read the judgment

7What it rests on

5Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

20223 judgments20241 judgments20251 judgments

5 judgments have relied on it, across 2022–2025

first 2022 · last 2025 · busiest 2022 (3 judgments)

2025-02-04A.B. AND Y.W. v. MALTAEuropean Court of Human Rights 2024-04-09LAZĂR v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rights 2022-12-20S.H. v. MALTAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2022-11-03SANCHEZ-SANCHEZ v. THE UNITED KINGDOMEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2022-04-29KHASANOV AND RAKHMANOV v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rights

What it rests on

2022-04-29KHASANOV AND RAKHMANOV v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rights 2016-03-23F.G. v. SWEDENEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2012-02-23HIRSI JAMAA AND OTHERS v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2011-01-21M.S.S. v. BELGIUM AND GREECEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2009-08-25GIULIANI AND GAGGIO v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2007-03-22MASLOV v. AUSTRIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2005-04-12SHAMAYEV AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA AND RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed

20 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

A.M. v. France, no. 12148/18A.S. v. France, no. 46240/15A. v. Switzerland, no. 60342/16Dzhaksybergenov v. Ukraine, no. 12343/10Gayratbek Saliyev v. Russia, no. 39093/13J.K. and Others v. Sweden [GC], no. 59166/12Kadirzhanov and Mamashev v. Russia, nos. 42351/13Khamrakulov v. Russia, no. 68894/13Makhmudzhan Ergashev v. Russia, no. 49747/11Mamadaliyev v. Russia, no. 5614/13Nabid Abdullayev v. Russia, no. 8474/14Nizomkhon Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 31890/11N. v. Finland, no. 38885/02R.C. v. Sweden, no. 41827/07R. v. Russia, no. 11916/15Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201/06Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10Tadzhibayev v. Russia, no. 17724/14Turgunov v. Russia, no. 15590/14X v. Sweden, no. 36417/16

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.