UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Glen SHAW, Defendant-Appellant

1983-03-15 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · United States

read the judgment

7What it rests on

2Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

19861 judgments5 years silent19911 judgments

2 judgments have relied on it, across 1986–1991

first 1986 · last 1991 · busiest 1986 (1 judgments)

1991-06-19Patrick Logan MONTGOMERY, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1986-03-06UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shirley MAGGITT and Tommy Maggitt, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

What it rests on

1979-10-01JACKSON v. VIRGINIA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States 1971-06-21Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States 1969-06-23Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States 1966-06-13Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States 1953-03-16LUTWAK Et Al. v. UNITED STATESSupreme Court of the United States 1942-02-09Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States 1938-05-31Johnson v. Zerbst, WardenSupreme Court of the United States

24 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.