Glasser v. United States

1942-02-09 · Supreme Court of the United States · United States

1What it rests on

6Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

19581 judgments8 years silent19661 judgments7 years silent19731 judgments6 years silent19791 judgments4 years silent19831 judgments19861 judgments

6 judgments have relied on it, across 1958–1986

first 1958 · last 1986 · busiest 1958 (1 judgments)

1986-03-06UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shirley MAGGITT and Tommy Maggitt, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1983-03-15UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Glen SHAW, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1979-10-01JACKSON v. VIRGINIA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States 1973-05-29Schneckloth, Conservation Center Superintendent v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States 1966-06-13Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States×2 1958-10-13Crooker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States

What it rests on

1938-05-31Johnson v. Zerbst, WardenSupreme Court of the United States

25 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.