Contract

the citation graph

MEDVEDYEV AND OTHERS v. FRANCE

2010-03-29 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe

read the judgment

12What it rests on

21Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

+5 earlier20212 judgments20223 judgments20232 judgments20243 judgments20252 judgments20262 judgments

21 judgments have relied on it, across 2012–2026

first 2012 · last 2026 · busiest 2017 (3 judgments)

2026-07-09JESUS PINHAL v. PORTUGALEuropean Court of Human Rights 2026-05-05Z.A. AND K.S. v. TÜRKİYEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2025-05-13SPITERI v. MALTAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2025-04-29DERREK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2024-06-25UKRAINE v. RUSSIA (RE CRIMEA)European Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2024-06-20FRIEDRICH AND OTHERS v. POLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2024-04-23AYDIN SEFA AKAY v. TÜRKİYEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2023-10-17A.D. v. MALTAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2023-06-27BRYAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2022-09-14H.F. AND OTHERS v. FRANCEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2022-09-13BAŞER AND ÖZÇELİK v. TÜRKİYEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2022-07-11KAVALA v. TÜRKİYEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2021-11-18M.H. AND OTHERS v. CROATIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2021-02-16HANAN v. GERMANYEuropean Court of Human Rights 2020-10-15MUHAMMAD AND MUHAMMAD v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rights 2017-11-28MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2017-03-14ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2017-02-23DE TOMMASO v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rights×2 2016-12-15KHLAIFIA AND OTHERS v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2013-07-23M.A. v. CYPRUSEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2012-09-12NADA v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rights

What it rests on

2007-12-13MOOREN v. GERMANYEuropean Court of Human Rights 2006-11-21DEMİR AND BAYKARA v. TURKEYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2005-05-12ÖCALAN v. TURKEYEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed 2004-11-10SEJDOVIC v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2004-07-08ILAŞCU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2004-04-08ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2002-06-20AZINAS v. CYPRUSEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2000-07-11DIKME v. TURKEYEuropean Court of Human Rights 2000-04-06LABITA v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2000-03-28BARANOWSKI v. POLANDEuropean Court of Human Rights×3followed 1999-04-29AQUILINA v. MALTAEuropean Court of Human Rights 1999-04-29T.W. v. MALTAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed

6 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Ciszewski v. Poland, no. 38668/97Freda v. Italy, no. 8916/80Goral v. Poland, no. 38654/97Paladi v. Moldova [GC], no. 39806/05Ramirez v. France, no. 28780/95Yumak and Sadak v. Turkey [GC], no. 10226/03

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.