Contract
JUDAI
the citation graph

TAXQUET v. BELGIUM

2009-01-13 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe

read the judgment

4What it rests on
34Relied on since
0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

34 judgments have relied on it, across 2010–2025

first 2010 · last 2025 · busiest 2025 (9 judgments)

2025-11-13ABO v. TÜRKİYEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-11-04VASILE RUSU v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-09-23HORA v. THE UNITED KINGDOMEuropean Court of Human Rights2025-04-29JAUPI v. ALBANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-04-24SYTNYK v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-03-25DEMİRER v. TÜRKİYEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-03-18MUSTAFA AYDIN v. TÜRKİYEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-01-21JÓHANNES BALDURSSON AND BIRKIR KRISTINSSON v. ICELAND European Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-01-14VASILE PRUTEANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-12-05KEZERASHVILI v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-11-26SOUROULLAS KAY AND ZANNETTOS v. CYPRUSEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2024-08-27W.R. v. THE NETHERLANDSEuropean Court of Human Rights2024-07-16MELI AND SWINKELS FAMILY BREWERS N.V. v. ALBANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-02-13MEHMET ZEKİ DOĞAN v. TÜRKİYE (No. 2)European Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-02-06SNIJDERS v. THE NETHERLANDSEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-12-14HUMPERT AND OTHERS v. GERMANYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-09-26YÜKSEL YALÇINKAYA v. TÜRKİYEEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2023-09-07OKROPIRIDZE v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-05-02STRASSENMEYER v. GERMANYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-11-08GAGGL v. AUSTRIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-10-20M.T. AND OTHERS v. SWEDENEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-10-18LOUCAIDES v. CYPRUSEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2022-07-05LOIZIDES v. CYPRUSEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-06-30RUSISHVILI v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-06-23GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLICEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2021-06-01DENIS AND IRVINE v. BELGIUMEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2018-12-18MURTAZALIYEVA v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2018-11-09BEUZE v. BELGIUMEuropean Court of Human Rights×3followed2015-12-15SCHATSCHASCHWILI v. GERMANYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2014-04-17SCHATSCHASCHWILI v. GERMANYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2014-03-25BIAO v. DENMARKEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2012-12-13DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2012-04-03KOTOV v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2010-11-16TAXQUET v. BELGIUMEuropean Court of Human Rights

What it rests on

5 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Askis and Others v. Greece, no. 48229/99Destrehem v. France, no. 56651/00Entreprises Robert Delbrassine S.A. and Others v. Belgium, no. 49204/99Somogyi v. Italy, no. 67972/01Tahir Duran v. Turkey, no. 40997/98