Contract
JUDAI
the citation graph

ALMEIDA ARROJA v. PORTUGAL

2024-03-19 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe

read the judgment

14What it rests on
2Relied on since
0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

2 judgments have relied on it, across 2025

first 2025 · last 2025 · busiest 2025 (2 judgments)

What it rests on

16 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Freitas Rangel v. Portugal, no. 78873/13 ×2Almeida Fernandes and Almeida Fernandes v. Portugal, no. 31566/13Alves da Silva v. Portugal, no. 41665/07Amorim Giestas and Jesus Costa Bordalo v. Portugal, no. 37840/10Bozhkov v. Bulgaria, no. 3316/04Cangi v. Turkey, no. 24973/15Egill Einarsson v. Iceland, no. 24703/15Haldimann and Others v. Switzerland, no. 21830/09Irodalom Kft v. Hungary, no. 64520/10Monica Macovei v. Romania, no. 53028/14Pais Pires de Lima v. Portugal, no. 70465/12Pinto Pinheiro Marques v. Portugal, no. 26671/09Scutelnicu v. Romania, no. 53899/00Standard Verlags GmbH and Krawagna-Pfeifer v. Austria, no. 19710/02Ürper and Others v. Turkey, nos. 14526/07