VALIULLINA AND OTHERS v. LATVIA

2023-09-14 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe

read the judgment

6What it rests on

6Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

20242 judgments20254 judgments

6 judgments have relied on it, across 2024–2025

first 2024 · last 2025 · busiest 2025 (4 judgments)

2025-10-28GREENPEACE NORDIC AND OTHERS v. NORWAYEuropean Court of Human Rights 2025-07-10RODINA AND BORISOVA v. LATVIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2025-07-09UKRAINE AND THE NETHERLANDS v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rights 2025-02-13P. v. POLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2024-12-17TAGANOVA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA AND RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2024-04-09GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (IV)European Court of Human Rights

What it rests on

2022-05-31X AND OTHERS v. ALBANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2017-01-24KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2016-05-24BIAO v. DENMARKEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2013-11-07VALLIANATOS AND OTHERS v. GREECEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2011-07-07STUMMER v. AUSTRIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2010-10-07KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed

13 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Allesch and Others v. Austria, no. 18168/91Carvalho Pinto de Sousa Morais v. Portugal, no. 17484/15Fabris v. France [GC], no. 16574/08Lautsi and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 30814/06Lavida and Others v. Greece, no. 7973/10Liebscher and Others v. Austria, no. 25170/94Maggio and Others v. Italy, nos. 46286/09Naidin v. Romania, no. 38162/07Others v. Croatia [GC], no. 15766/03Others v. Romania, nos. 81114/17Ponomaryovi v. Bulgaria, no. 5335/05Sampani and Others v. Greece, no. 59608/09Sampanis and Others v. Greece, no. 32526/05

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.