HOVHANNISYAN AND NAZARYAN v. ARMENIA

2022-11-08 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe

read the judgment

7What it rests on

8Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

20234 judgments20242 judgments20252 judgments

8 judgments have relied on it, across 2023–2025

first 2023 · last 2025 · busiest 2023 (4 judgments)

2025-12-11INTRANUOVO v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2025-12-04KHAGHAGHUTYAN YERKKHOSUTYUN v. ARMENIAEuropean Court of Human Rights 2024-10-29HARUTYUN KARAPETYAN v. ARMENIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2024-06-04VARYAN v. ARMENIAEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed 2023-11-07DURDAJ AND OTHERS v. ALBANIAEuropean Court of Human Rights 2023-10-17DIMAKSYAN v. ARMENIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2023-10-17HOVHANNISYAN AND KARAPETYAN v. ARMENIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2023-04-25OHANJANYAN v. ARMENIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed

What it rests on

2022-04-05NANA MURADYAN v. ARMENIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2019-07-04KURT v. AUSTRIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2018-03-20RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2017-03-28FERNANDES DE OLIVEIRA v. PORTUGALEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed 2014-09-17MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2009-08-25GIULIANI AND GAGGIO v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2002-06-13ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed

10 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Aliyeva and Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 35587/08Al Nashiri v. Poland, no. 28761/11Anahit Mkrtchyan v. Armenia, no. 3673/11Beker v. Turkey, no. 27866/03Boychenko v. Russia, no. 8663/08Durdu v. Turkey, no. 30677/10Lapshin v. Azerbaijan, no. 13527/18Muradyan v. Armenia, no. 11275/07Others v. Turkey, no. 40145/98Tsintsabadze v. Georgia, no. 35403/06

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.