Contract
JUDAI
the citation graph

OOO MEMO v. RUSSIA

2022-03-15 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe

read the judgment

2What it rests on
3Relied on since
0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

3 judgments have relied on it, across 2022–2025

first 2022 · last 2025 · busiest 2022 (1 judgments)

What it rests on

24 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Frisk and Jensen v. Denmark, no. 19657/12 ×2Margulev v. Russia, no. 15449/09 ×2Cheltsova v. Russia, no. 44294/06Dyuldin and Kislov v. Russia, no. 25968/02Freitas Rangel v. Portugal, no. 78873/13Goryaynova v. Ukraine, no. 41752/09Kharlamov v. Russia, no. 27447/07Khuzhin and Others v. Russia, no. 13470/02Novaya Gazeta and Milashina v. Russia, no. 45083/06OOO Izdatelskiy Tsentr Kvartirnyy Ryad v. Russia, no. 39748/05OOO Regnum v. Russia, no. 22649/08Ostanina v. Russia, no. 22169/11Reznik v. Russia, no. 4977/05Romanenko and Others v. Russia, no. 11751/03Savva Terentyev v. Russia, no. 10692/09Sener v. Turkey, no. 26680/95Skudayeva v. Russia, no. 24014/07Thoma v. Luxembourg, no. 38432/97Timakov and OOO ID Rubezh v. Russia, nos. 46232/10Tolmachev v. Russia, no. 42182/11Uj v. Hungary, no. 23954/10Uzeyir Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no. 54204/08