Contract
JUDAI
the citation graph

XERO FLOR w POLSCE sp. z o. o. v. POLAND

2021-05-07 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe

read the judgment

9What it rests on
19Relied on since
0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

19 judgments have relied on it, across 2022–2026

first 2022 · last 2026 · busiest 2025 (6 judgments)

What it rests on

21 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Agrokompleks v. Ukraine, no. 23465/03 ×2Voggenreiter v. Germany, no. 47169/99 ×2Alatulkkila and Others v. Finland, no. 33538/96Becker v. Germany, no. 45448/99Diamantides v. Greece, no. 60821/00Dos Santos Calado and Others v. Portugal, nos. 55997/14Fabris v. France [GC], no. 16574/08Fabris v. France, no. 16574/08Klein v. Germany, no. 33379/96Kristiana Ltd. v. Lithuania, no. 36184/13Mateos and Others v. Spain, no. 14324/88Meimanis v. Latvia, no. 70597/11Petrella v. Italy, no. 24340/07Pronina v. Ukraine, no. 63566/00Soto Sanchez v. Spain, no. 66990/01Sutarzewicz and Gorczak v. Poland, nos. 27702/95Ullens de Schooten and Rezabek v. Belgium, nos. 3989/07Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00Wagner and J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg, no. 76240/01