the citation graph
Muskrat v. United States; Brown and Gritts v. United States
1911-02-20 · Supreme Court of the United States · United States
2What it rests on
12Relied on since
0Departed from
Relied on since
The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.
+4 earlier19392 judgments19421 judgments19431 judgments18 years silent19611 judgments7 years silent19681 judgments19702 judgments
12 judgments have relied on it, across 1922–1970
first 1922 · last 1970 · busiest 1939 (2 judgments)
1970-03-09BARLOW Et Al. v. COLLINS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL STABILIZATION AND CONSERVATION SERVICE, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1970-03-03ASSOCIATION OF DATA PROCESSING SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS, INC., Et Al. v. CAMP, COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1968-06-10FLAST Et Al. v. COHEN, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1961-10-09POE Et Al. v. ULLMAN, STATE'S ATTORNEYSupreme Court of the United States1943-02-08ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES OF NEW YORK STATE, Inc., v. ICKES, Secretary of the Interior, Et Al.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit1942-04-06Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States1939-06-05COLEMAN Et Al. v. MILLER, SECRETARY OF THE SENATE OF THE STATE OF KANSAS, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1939-04-17ROCHESTER TELEPHONE CORP. v. UNITED STATES Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1937-03-01AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. HAWORTH Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1936-02-17ASHWANDER Et Al. v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1924-03-03The Chicago Junction CaseSupreme Court of the United States1922-02-27Fairchild v. Hughes, as Secretary of State of the United States, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States
What it rests on
1892-02-29Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Company v. WellmanSupreme Court of the United States1803-02-24WILLIAM MARBURY v. JAMES MADISON, Secretary of State of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States
4 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.