John Swift v. George W. Tyson

1842-01-25 · Supreme Court of the United States · United States

0What it rests on

6Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

18731 judgments16 years silent18891 judgments35 years silent19241 judgments4 years silent19281 judgments10 years silent19381 judgments27 years silent19651 judgments

6 judgments have relied on it, across 1873–1965

first 1873 · last 1965 · busiest 1873 (1 judgments)

1965-04-26Hanna v. Plumer, ExecutorSupreme Court of the United States 1938-04-25Erie Railroad Co. v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States×2 1928-04-09Black and White Taxicab and Transfer Company v. Brown and Yellow Taxicab and Transfer CompanySupreme Court of the United States 1924-02-18Salem Trust Company v. Manufacturers’ Finance Company Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States 1889-03-05Liverpool and Great Western Steam Company v. Phenix Insurance CompanySupreme Court of the United States 1873-10-27Boyce v. TabbSupreme Court of the United States

What it rests on

No citation has been read out of this judgment.

The European Court does not publish its citations as data. They are read out of the text of the judgment itself. Until that reading reaches this judgment, it has no outgoing edge.

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.