CITADEL HOLDING CORPORATION, a Corporation of the State of Delaware, Defendant Below, Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. Alfred ROVEN, Plaintiff Below, Appellee/Cross Appellant

1992-02-18 · Supreme Court of Delaware · United States

read the judgment

2What it rests on

4Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

19931 judgments12 years silent20052 judgments21 years silent20261 judgments

4 judgments have relied on it, across 1993–2026

first 1993 · last 2026 · busiest 2005 (2 judgments)

2026-07-17Bobby Sarnevesht v. Triller Group Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware 2005-11-17HOMESTORE, INC., Defendant Below, Appellant, v. Peter TAFEEN, Plaintiff Below, AppelleeSupreme Court of Delaware 2005-07-05Thomas T.S. KAUNG, Plaintiff-Below, Appellant, v. COLE NATIONAL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation Defendant-Below, AppelleeSupreme Court of Delaware 1993-03-08Marilyn ZIRN, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. VLI CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Robert A. Elliott, Charlotte O'Hara Vorhauer, Personal Representative of the Estate of Bruce Vorhauer, Lawrance A. Brown, Jr., Barbara Best North and American Home Products Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants Below, AppelleesSupreme Court of Delaware

What it rests on

1978-08-14Philip L. MOSKOWITZ, Trustee, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF WILMINGTON, Now Known as the City of Wilmington, Defendant Below, AppelleeSupreme Court of Delaware 1952-11-05Fidanque v. American Maracaibo Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware

9 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.