CM & M GROUP, INC., Defendant Below, Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. Thomas J. CARROLL, Plaintiff Below, Appellee, Cross-Appellant

1982-09-15 · Supreme Court of Delaware · United States

read the judgment

5What it rests on

4Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

19861 judgments19891 judgments19921 judgments4 years silent19961 judgments

4 judgments have relied on it, across 1986–1996

first 1986 · last 1996 · busiest 1986 (1 judgments)

1996-08-26Edward O. GOODRICH, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. E.F. HUTTON GROUP, INC., and E.F. Hutton Group & Company, Inc., Defendants Below, AppelleesSupreme Court of Delaware 1992-04-09W.B. Dixon STROUD, Jr., Morris W. Stroud, Agnes S. Peele, and Anne S. Bradford, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. J. Peter GRACE, Dr. George C. Dacey, Dr. T.J. Malone, Roger Milliken, H.W. Jockers, Dr. H. Keith Brodie, Minot K. Milliken, F.G. Rogers, Rene C. McPherson, Gerrish H. Milliken, and Milliken & Company, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants Below, AppelleesSupreme Court of Delaware 1989-07-03TANDYCRAFTS, INC., R.E. Cox, III, Roger A. Dickinson, Kenneth L. Gregson, William H. Michero, Joe K. Pace, Robert Schutts, and John A. Wilson, Defendants Below, Appellants, v. INITIO PARTNERS, Plaintiff Below, AppelleeSupreme Court of Delaware 1986-07-11William B. WEINBERGER and Edward U. Notz, Plaintiffs, v. UOP, INC., the Signal Companies, Inc., and Sigco Incorporated, DefendantsCourt of Chancery of Delaware

What it rests on

1972-01-04Theodore LEVITT Et Al., Plaintiffs Below, Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. John A. BOUVIER, Jr., Defendant Below, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, and American Mushroom Corp., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant Below, AppelleeSupreme Court of Delaware 1968-05-10Peggy M. CHAVIN, I. Favel Chavin, and James P. Quinn, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. Beatrice A. COPE, Defendant Below, AppelleeSupreme Court of Delaware 1967-06-21Grace L. WALSH and Robert Walsh, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. HOTEL CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Defendant Below, AppelleeSupreme Court of Delaware 1966-10-17Chrysler Corporation, Defendant Below, Appellant, Cross-Appellee, vs. Sol A. Dann Et Al., and Mary L. Gallo Et Al., Plaintiffs and Petitioners Below, Appellees, Cross-AppellantsSupreme Court of Delaware 1953-03-27Bertha E. Maurer, vs. International Re-Insurance Corporation, a Corporation Organized and Existing Under the Laws of the State of Delaware. Appeal of William Prickett From the Order of the Chancellor Dated January 27, 1953, on the Petition of William Prickett for an Allowance Out of the Defendant’s Estate. AND Cross-Appeal of Arthur G. Logan and William D. Denney, Receivers of International Re-Insurance Corporation, From a Part of the Order of the Chancellor of the State of Delaware Dated January 27, 1953, on the Petition of William Prickett for an Allowance Out of the Receivership EstateSupreme Court of Delaware

6 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.