ALASKA ELECTRICAL PENSION, FUND, Plaintiff Intervenor, Below Appellant, v. Stephen L. BROWN, Crady Family Trust, Michael Crady, Plaintiffs Below, Appellees, and Lyon Homes, Inc., General William Lyon, William H. Lyon, Harold H. Greene, Arthur B. Laffer, and Lawrence M. Higby, James E. Dalton, Richard E. Frankel, Gary H. Hunt, and Alex Meruelo, Defendants Below, Appellees

2010-01-14 · Supreme Court of Delaware · United States

read the judgment

3What it rests on

2Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

20111 judgments15 years silent20261 judgments

2 judgments have relied on it, across 2011–2026

first 2011 · last 2026 · busiest 2011 (1 judgments)

2026-07-23Samvit Ramadurgam v. Destiny XYZ Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware 2011-02-09WILLIAM PENN PARTNERSHIP, Robert M. Hoyt, Trustee Under Revocable Trust Agreement of Robert M. Hoyt Dated 6/30/93, T. William Lingo, Bryce Lingo, J.G. Townsend, Jr. & Co., Beacon Revex, LLC, and Del Bay Associates, LLC, Defendants Below, Appellants, v. Anis K. SALIBA, Trustee Under Revocable Trust Agreement of Anis K. Saliba Dated 6/27/91; And Rosa Ksebe, Trustee Under Revocable Trust Agreement of Kamal Ksebe Dated 5/22/85, Plaintiffs Below, AppelleesSupreme Court of Delaware

What it rests on

2005-06-28CEDE & CO. and Cinerama, Inc., Petitioners Below—Appellants, v. TECHNICOLOR, INC., Respondent Below—AppelleeSupreme Court of Delaware 1996-08-26Edward O. GOODRICH, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. E.F. HUTTON GROUP, INC., and E.F. Hutton Group & Company, Inc., Defendants Below, AppelleesSupreme Court of Delaware 1972-01-04Theodore LEVITT Et Al., Plaintiffs Below, Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. John A. BOUVIER, Jr., Defendant Below, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, and American Mushroom Corp., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant Below, AppelleeSupreme Court of Delaware

6 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.