Contract
JUDAI
all cases

ILEANA ROȘU v. ROMANIA

2026-07-16 · Did the respondent State violate Articles 35, 35-1, 35-3-a, P1-1 of the European Convention on Human Rights on these facts?

JUDAI saidno answer
The Court decidedno violationdeclined to answer

Why it declined

The evidence was too thin to support a recommendation.

How the confidence was reached

1 separate judgments back this analysis
One of them binds the question.
5 of the 30 passages searched actually answered the question
100% of the quoted passages matched the source text exactly
Whether any authority here has been departed from: not checked. Detection by wording was measured at around 40% precision, so nothing is claimed either way.

Citation record

What it rests on3
Relied on since0
Departed fromnot found
point outside the corpus2
see every citation